Why this rating: On-chain DVM governance: UMA holders vote (commit-reveal) on UMIPs, price requests and disputes; Snapshot (uma.eth) for funding/emissions. The DVM's Optimistic Oracle + dispute mechanism is the batch's strongest GSA-8 candidate (near-miss). No economic rights — rewards are inflation-funded, fee-buybacks discretionary. GSA-8 near-miss: on-chain Optimistic Oracle + DVM dispute resolution (commit-reveal voting) is the closest any DAO in the batch comes to GSA-8; not scored pass without contract-verified full dispute path; GSA-7 near-miss: staked-voter-only participation, commit-reveal voting, incorrect-voter reward slashing — real sybil/capture resistance; token-weighted plutocracy remains
GSA-8 near-miss: on-chain Optimistic Oracle + DVM dispute resolution (commit-reveal voting) is the closest any DAO in the batch comes to GSA-8; not scored pass without contract-verified full dispute path
GSA-3 fail: voting rewards are inflation-funded (0.05% of supply per period to correct voters), not protocol revenue; fee-funded UMA purchases discretionary ('DVM may charge fees... to buy UMA tokens')
2025 emissions-reduction votes (Roll 1/2) cut UMA inflation
No proposal history is available for UMA in the current scanner window.
Metrics
Curated metric — next quarterly update. On-chain revenue, treasury, and distribution-enforcement reads are not yet wired for this DAO's space in the Institute's state files; the quarterly re-assessment cycle will populate this block.
GSA-8 near-miss: on-chain Optimistic Oracle + DVM dispute resolution (commit-reveal voting) is the closest any DAO in the batch comes to GSA-8; not scored pass without contract-verified full dispute path
GSA-3 fail: voting rewards are inflation-funded (0.05% of supply per period to correct voters), not protocol revenue; fee-funded UMA purchases discretionary ('DVM may charge fees... to buy UMA tokens')
2025 emissions-reduction votes (Roll 1/2) cut UMA inflation